Skip to content
Casino Blog World

Rock Band Record Artwork Lawsuit Dismissed as Infant Model Loses Court Battle

The Band's Famous Nevermind Cover
Nevermind by Nirvana, pictured in 1991, was ranked sixth on Rolling Stone's recent ranking of the greatest records of all time

The individual featured as a infant on the front of the band's classic album the famous release has failed in his efforts to sue the group for distributing child pornography.

A four-month-old the now-adult man was pictured floating naked below the surface on the 1991 LP's famous cover.

He sued the musical group and photographer Kirk Weddle, but a court official has determined that "neither the pose, focal point, environment, or general circumstances suggest the record artwork features inappropriate sexual content"

Legal counsel for Nirvana stated: "We are pleased the court has concluded this baseless lawsuit and cleared our creative defendants of the stigma of false allegations"
Album Cover Details
A $1 note on a fishing line was incorporated to the photo of baby the subject swimming below water for the album cover

Mr Elden originally filed a legal complaint in 2021, arguing that his identity and name were "forever tied to the commercial misuse he experienced as a child which has been circulated and marketed worldwide"

US District Judge the presiding judge dismissed it in 2022 because Mr Elden submitted it past the decade-long deadline for filing a civil case.

A higher court overturned that decision, permitting Mr Elden to resubmit the case.

However, the court has now ruled that, aside from the reality Mr Elden was unclothed, no element came "close to bringing the photograph under the scope of the exploitation laws"

He compared the picture to a personal snapshot of a child in the bath, and said it is "plainly insufficient to uphold a finding" of exploitative content.

"Being unclothed must be combined with additional factors that make the visual depiction lascivious or sexually provocative", Judge Olguin noted, citing from an earlier ruling.

The judge also mentioned considerations such as the presence of Mr Elden's parents at the photo shoot, the fact the photographer was a acquaintance, and the fact he had previously "accepted and financially benefitted from appearing on the album cover"

Mr Elden's attorneys said they "respectfully disagree" with the decision and plan to appeal.

"As long as the entertainment industry prioritizes profits over childhood privacy, consent, and dignity, we will persist in our quest for awareness and accountability", said James R Marsh of the Marsh Law Firm.

Related Court Updates

  • The Band Successfully Defend Lawsuit Regarding 1991 Album Artwork
  • The Group Faced Legal Action by the Baby from Their Album Cover
Music
About the author

Kristie Rogers

A seasoned gambling analyst with over a decade of experience in the UK casino industry, specializing in game reviews and betting strategies.

Casino Blog World

Type to search articles.